|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 93-98
Need for appropriate hospital attire in orthopedic patients
Yashpal Gulati, Prince Raina, YS Suresh Babu
Department of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||04-Feb-2021|
|Date of Decision||15-Mar-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||30-Mar-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||31-May-2021|
Y S Suresh Babu
Department of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi 110 076
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Literature review shows multiple studies on the role of physician attire on patient perceptions. These studies came up with the conclusion that specific dress design might improve the patient-physician bonding. A less likely studied factor in literature was the design of patient attire. The present study aims to design and assess the efficacy of ORTHO dress in orthopedic specialty patients. Patients and Methods: The study population includes 136 patients (62 males and 74 females) presenting to the in-patient department and admitted under orthopedic specialty over 6 months from September 2018 to February 2019 with upper and lower limb illness. The picture-based survey of patient’s preferences regarding choice of attire was conducted on the 3rd day of hospital stay. Results: The mean age of patients was 42.26 ± 10.24 years. The age distribution involves 78 cases (57.35%) were between 15 and 60 years and 58 cases (42.64%) were more than 60 years of age The results show that 124 patients (91.17%) preferred ORTHO dress when dress choice was given when compared with usual hospital dress. Chi-square analysis was used as a test of significance. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Conclusion: Patient attire is the least studied parameter in the medical literature. The influence of specific specialty on patient’s attire is never studied. The ORTHO dress being newly designed and used in orthopedic patients involving upper and lower limb illness plays important role in patient management and has a role in providing better nursing and postoperative rehabilitative care.
Keywords: Ortho dress, patient attire, physician attire
|How to cite this article:|
Gulati Y, Raina P, Suresh Babu Y S. Need for appropriate hospital attire in orthopedic patients. Apollo Med 2021;18:93-8
| Introduction|| |
The doctor–patient relationship depends on numerous factors varying from the skill of the doctor to the attitude of the physician. It is observed that patients being more compliant with doctors who respect them. Apart from competence, doctor attire and behavior play a very important role in doctor–patient bonding., Strong bonding between the two overcomes many barriers to disease management., Over the past few years and with the advent of technology, the patient has become more intelligent about their illnesses. It benefits the physician as fewer efforts are being needed to explain the procedure but sometimes also become harmful both for patient and physician as inadequate knowledge diverts the mind to one particular direction. The literature review shows that the strategies involved in gaining the patient’s trust and confidence are highly desirable. The studies show that physician attire plays a very important role in building patient confidence as it is the first bonding factor. A professional dress positively reinforces the patient.,, It is equally important that patients are given appropriate dress during their stay in the hospital so that in-patient procedures such as a change of dressings, suture removal, and plaster application can be carried out by the physician quickly, efficiently and without offending the patient’ modesty. The least likely studied factor in literature is the type of best possible patient attire. The usual designs vary from one place to another. No universal design concept is available. The present study aims at assessing and explaining the benefits of the attire designed by our team (ORTHO dress), in orthopedic patient care. The dress was designed especially for orthopedic patients presenting with limb injuries or elective joint surgeries.
| Patients and Methods|| |
The present study includes in-patient department cases admitted for orthopedic illness involving upper and lower limbs. A total of 136 cases (62 males and 74 females) admitted under orthopedic specialty from September 2018 to February 2019 were randomly included in the study. Inclusion criteria involve both male and female patients were included, patients admitted under orthopedic specialty only, cases with either upper and lower limb involvement or both, cases with no documented brain injury. Exclusion criteria include pediatrics patients with age <15 years, cases other than upper or lower limb involvement such as the spine and pelvic disease cases, cases who refused to take part in the study. Patients with an expected length of stay less than 5 days were also excluded from the study [Figure 1]. No upper age limit was defined. Disease pattern included was upper and lower limb diseases such as trauma cases involving limb including both long and short bones fractures, soft-tissue pathologies, joint diseases involving upper and lower limbs including hip and shoulder joints, and tumor cases involving limbs [Table 1] No other specialty cases were included in the study.
The study design involves a “picture-based survey of patient’s preference” regarding the choice of dress to be used throughout the hospital stay. The picture-based choice of dress was allowed to be done by the patient on the “3rd day” of hospital stay. During the initial stay period, the usual hospital-designed dress was given to the patient on the 1st day of stay. On the 2nd day, ORTHO dress was given to all patients. On the 3rd day, picture–based survey of patient’s preferences was done. Patients were asked to opt for the dress of their choice. The picture-based choice involves three dresses only, two usual hospital dresses, and one specially designed ORTHO dress [Figure 2].
The “ORTHO dress”
It involves two components, an upper shirt, and lower trouser. The unique feature specific to ORTHO dress is a modified outer border involving all four limbs that exposes the whole limb as per surgeons need without patient’s discomfort. The orthopedic surgeon has a role in treating diseases, specific to the limbs (upper and lower limbs). Normal dress, when used in patients undergoing limb surgery, causes difficulty in limb exposure without dress removal. It becomes more difficult in female patients undergoing limb surgery as they need regular postsurgery limb dressings and joint physiotherapy. The ORTHO dress has an important beneficial role in these patients. Complete upper and lower extremities can be exposed without dress removal, with ease of any needed position, and modesty is protected and is thus acceptable and comfortable to female patients too. The shirt allows for complete exposure of the limb circumferentially from the shoulder joint to the hand. The lower limb can be exposed from the hip joint to the tip of the toes [Figure 3]. The trouser height for ORTHO dress was kept short of anklelength, i.e., about 5 cm above ankle joint as long length trousers impairs patient walk during postsurgery rehabilitation period.
It is unisexual, available in three sizes, contemporary utilitarian design made of high-quality cotton fabric and pleasant shades for greater comfort. The shirt and trousers are provided with large pockets anteriorly. One anteriorly for the shirt and one on either side anteriorly for the trouser to accommodate the canister of an epidural or local anesthetic pump during ambulation in the immediate postoperative period.
The shirt is designed to be half sleeved with a wide round neck and completely open at the back for easier donning. The shirt is fastened by simple tie knots of the tags provided at the rear side of the shirt. On the outer side ream of the sleeves on either side, a high-quality smooth zipper with adequate sized pull-tag and the corresponding slider is provided to allow the sleeves to be split open beyond the level of the shoulder to the level of the base of the neck. This allows most surgical wounds of the upper limb to be uncovered [Figure 3] and [Figure 4].
The trousers are of ankle length (about 5 cm from the ankle joint) with a broad soft elastic and a fastening cord at the waist. It is designed to be donned similarly to regular trousers from the foot end. A high-quality zipper runs along the whole length of the outer seam of the trousers. The zipper is provided with a high-quality pull tab and slider [Figure 5] and [Figure 6].
|Figure 6: Complete lower limb (hip, knee, and foot) and upper limb (shoulder, elbow, and hand) exposure with the patient in ORTHO dress (a) Attire with knee exposed, (b) Attire with hip exposed, (c) Attire with shoulder exposed, (d) Attire with elbow exposed|
Click here to view
The data were collected and recorded in Microsoft Excel-based software and analyzed using SPSS software. Quantitative nominal data collection and analysis were done [Table 2]. Chi-square analysis was used as a test of significance. Probability value, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data were collected and calculated by an independent observer other than the author. Type 1 error, alpha was taken as 0.05. Type II error, beta cut-off was set as 0.2, indicating a 20% chance that significant difference is missed. The power of the study was 80%.
| Results|| |
A total of 136 patients (62 males and 74 females) admitted under orthopedic specialty over 6 months were assessed regarding their choice of attire on the 3rd day of hospital stay. A picture-based survey of patient’s preferences was done. The mean age of 136 patients was 42.26 ± 10.24 years. The age distribution involved was 78 cases (57.35%) were between 15 and 60 years and 58 cases (42.64%) were > 60 years of age. The results show that a total of 124 patients (91.18%) preferred ORTHO dress to be continued over the remaining stay period in the hospital [Figure 7]. The majority of the cases were elective adult reconstruction surgeries and the length of stay was decided by clinical pathway guidelines followed by the institution. The reason for the choice was the same in all patients, i.e., easy limb exposure for dressing and physiotherapy without complete dress removal. Twelve patients (8.82%) with isolated hand and foot injuries opted for the usual hospital dress with no preference regarding ORTHO dress. Quantitative nominal data collection and analysis were done [Table 2]. Chi-square analysis was done. The result shows statistical significance with P < 0.005.
|Figure 7: Distribution of the choice of patient attire, vis-a-vis day of admission|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The doctor–patient relationship plays a very important role in disease management. Positive bonding between the two reinforces the patient to share maximum details about their illness and medication compliance., It also positively reinforces role-playing behavior in patients and helps in disease management., Multiple modalities are being searched to gain the patient’s confidence, to improve healthcare compliance, and achieve better outcomes. A study by Petrilli et al. concluded that perceptions of attire are influenced by age, locale, setting, and context of care. Policy-based interventions that target such factors appear necessary.
In 2009, Mahmud stated that The doctor–patient relationship is central to the practice of medicine and is essential for high-quality health care in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Over the period, multiple studies have been conducted over the globe to assess the impact of parameters such as white coats as outpatient department dress, white coat as ward round dress, dresses such as scrubs and blue jeans, slippers or shots, the role of tattoos and piercings, and even attitude of doctor on long-term bonding between doctor and patient and thus indirectly affecting the disease management.,,,, Other important parameters include name badges to be worn by the doctor, the shift from white coat to smart casuals, below elbow versus short coats, type of hairstyles, and role of below-knee long length skirts as female attire.,,, Dancer and Duerden argue that the possible harm to the patient–doctor relationship due to the loss of the white coat outweighs the putative benefits in terms of infection control. Although extensive work on the role of physician’s attire is available, literature is sparse about the appropriate in-patient attire. This study makes an effort to address this insufficiency.
Patient attire was defined as the dress to be used by the patient throughout their stay in the hospital for treatment. It can be either personal or hospital-issued clothing. Usual attire varies from one place to another and even within a single geographic area. It can be either a single piece involving a long gown such as a dress or two-piece dress, upper shirt, and lower trouser. The present study involves the assessment of cases presenting to the in-patient department and admitted under orthopedic specialty over 6 months. A total of 136 patients (62 males and 74 females) were included in the study. Patients were assessed regarding their choice of attire on the 3rd day of hospital stay. A picture-based survey of patient’s preferences was conducted. The mean age was 42.26 ± 10.24 years. The age distribution was 78 cases (57.35%) were between 15 and 60 years and 58 cases (42.64%) were more than 60 years of age. The results show that a total of 124 patients (91.17%) preferred ORTHO dress to be continued over the remaining stay period in the hospital. Twelve patients (8.82%) with isolated hand and foot injuries opted for the usual hospital dress with no preference regarding ORTHO dress [Figure 4]. The dress was used uniformly for all patients admitted to the orthopedic department. Many hand and foot surgeries would require proximal exposure for purpose of plaster immobilization and therefore the “Ortho dress” would serve them well. Quantitative nominal data collection and analysis were done [Table 2]. Chi-square analysis was done. The result shows statistical significance.
Literature shows multiple studies regarding the choice of doctor’s attire preferred by patients. A formal dress with a white apron being preferred in many studies. Literature is scarce with studies regarding the choice of the best possible patient’s attire. The orthopedic specialty works with upper and lower limb pathologies. The management options usually involve plasters, splints, regular wound dressings, external fixation methods, muscle strengthening procedures, and joint physiotherapy exercises. Both upper and lower limbs can be involved in the pathological procedure. Because of better patient care, postsurgery wound management, and patient privacy, the ORTHO dress was designed and the results were studied regarding the efficacy and compliance.
The genesis of the study and designing of ORTHO dress emerged by regular observation of patients becoming uncomfortable while limb dressing and physiotherapy sessions. The discomfiture being more obvious in female patients.
The strength of the study lies in the fact that it is the first study in the literature assessing the role of patient’s attire with disease treatment. The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital providing healthcare to patients from across the globe. The dress has been adopted as the preferred hospital attire for orthopedic patients at the tertiary center where the study was conducted.
The limitations specified for the present study are that:
- It is a single center-based assessment of results
- Small sample size
- Specific to a single specialty
- It needs external validation.
| Conclusion|| |
Unlike the doctor’s attire, the patient attire is the least studied parameter in literature. The ORTHO dress being newly designed and used in orthopedic patients involving upper and lower limb illness plays important role in patient management. The dress is designed to give patients comfort and providing better nursing care. In cases of polytrauma, the use of any type of attire is difficult, but when some form of hospital attire is to be used the “Ortho dress” offers a distinct advantage over other designs. Further study in the case of polytrauma patients as to the need and type of hospital attire is suggested.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Kurihara H, Maeno T, Maeno T. Importance of physicians’ attire: Factors influencing the impression it makes on patients, a cross-sectional study. Asia Pac Fam Med 2014;13:2.
Chang DS, Lee H, Lee H, Park HJ, Chae Y. What to wear when practicing oriental medicine: Patients’ preferences for doctors’ attire. J Altern Complement Med 2011;17:763-7.
Edwards RD, Saladyga AT, Schriver JP, Davis KG. Patient attitudes to surgeons’ attire in an outpatient clinic setting: Substance over style. Am J Surg 2012;204:663-5.
Gallagher J, Waldron Lynch F, Stack J, Barragry J. Dress and address: Patient preferences regarding doctor’s style of dress and patient interaction. Ir Med J 2008;101:211-3.
Rehman SU, Nietert PJ, Cope DW, Kilpatrick AO. What to wear today? Effect of doctor’s attire on the trust and confidence of patients. Am J Med 2005;118:1279-86.
Jin J, Sklar GE, Min Sen Oh V, Chuen Li S. Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient’s perspective. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2008;4:269-86.
Baevsky RH, Fisher AL, Smithline HA, Salzberg MR. The influence of physician attire on patient satisfaction. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:82-4.
Barbosa CD, Balp MM, Kulich K, Germain N, Rofail D. A literature review to explore the link between treatment satisfaction and adherence, compliance, and persistence. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012;6:39-48.
Chung H, Lee H, Chang DS, Kim HS, Lee H, Park HJ, et al
. Doctor’s attire influences perceived empathy in the patient-doctor relationship. Patient Educ Couns 2012;89:387-91.
Bianchi MT. Desiderata or dogma: What the evidence reveals about physician attire. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:641-3.
Petrilli CM, Mack M, Petrilli JJ, Hickner A, Saint S, Chopra V. Understanding the role of physician attire on patient perceptions: A systematic review of the literature – Targeting attire to improve likelihood of rapport (TAILOR) investigators. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006578.
Mahmud A. Doctor-patient relationship. Pulse 2009;3:12-4.
Brandt LJ. On the value of an old dress code in the new millennium. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1277-81.
Yonekura CL, Certain L, Karen SK, Alcântara GA, Ribeiro LG, Rodrigues-Júnior AL, et al
. Perceptions of patients, physicians, and medical students on physicians’ appearance. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2013;59:452-9.
Reddy R. Slippers and a white coat? (Hawai’i physician attire study). Hawaii Med J 2009;68:284-5.
Johnson SC, Doi ML, Yamamoto LG. Adverse Effects of Tattoos and Piercing on Parent/Patient Confidence in Health Care Providers. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016;55:915-20. doi: 10.1177/0009922815616889. Epub 2015 Nov 24. PMID: 26603585.
de Groot H. Doctors’ dress code. S Afr Med J 2008;98:658.
Collins AM, Connaughton J, Ridgway PF. Bare below the elbows: A comparative study of a tertiary and district general hospital. Ir Med J 2013;106:272-5.
Hueston WJ, Carek SM. Patients’ preference for physician attire: A survey of patients in family medicine training practices. Fam Med 2011;43:643-7.
Dancer SG, Duerden BI. Changes to clinician attire have done more harm than good. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2014;44:293-8.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
[Table 1], [Table 2]